The core idea
A feed workflow should define what a summary or label means before choosing a model. Separate the instructions, source text, approved vocabulary, and review criteria. This allows an editor to compare candidate implementations without changing the underlying publication standard every time the model configuration changes.
A workable starting pattern
Check current provider documentation when implementing your own integration. Keep input boundaries explicit, test quoted instructions inside source material, and retain examples where the output failed. Evaluate whether the workflow preserves source qualifications rather than judging it only by fluency or formatting.
A source document can contain a quoted prompt as part of an article. The summarization task should describe that quotation, not treat it as a new instruction that overrides the publication’s rules.
What this page does—and does not—offer
TagsFeed has no official Anthropic or Claude affiliation. This page does not run inference, accept prompts, or provide a connected service.
