The core idea
A summary is a derived representation. It should not quietly add facts from memory, change a tentative statement into certainty, or make the original author appear to recommend something they did not. Keep the original article and the selected source version accessible to the reviewer.
A workable starting pattern
Define the intended audience and a small output structure. Require recoverable support for material takeaways, then review missing qualifications as well as invented additions. Separate structural validation from factual checking. When the source changes, inspect every summary and digest that depends on it.
A report based on a small test should retain that limitation in its short version. Removing the qualification can change the reader’s interpretation even when every remaining sentence sounds polished.
What this page does—and does not—offer
No article submission or live summarization is available here. TagsFeed explains workflows and evaluation criteria without offering a hosted summary engine.
